Valuation and asset workflows

Alternative Assets Valuation and Governance Engine

Structures recurring valuation inputs, methodologies, assumptions, runs, adjustments, approvals, and review evidence.

Category: Valuation and asset workflows
Sector fit: Core: Asset Management and Private Markets. Related: Banking and Corporates.

The operational problem

Valuation inputs arrived through accounting extracts, portfolio files, legal documents, operating models, reference data, and committee adjustments. Asset identifiers varied across files, assumptions changed between review periods, and spreadsheet formulas mixed source facts with analyst judgment. Reviewers could see a reported figure but struggled to identify its data vintage, methodology version, adjustment history, or approval path. Reperformance depended on the analyst who assembled the workbook. The institution needed a consistent calculation record that preserved asset-specific judgment while keeping every input and transformation reviewable.

How it was engineered

Markets IQ modeled investments, instruments, positions, cash flows, assumptions, scenarios, methodologies, sources, and approvals as separate governed objects. The ingestion layer retains original files and maps extracted fields into typed records with units, currency, period, and effective date. Validation reconciles positions to source totals and flags stale, missing, or conflicting inputs before calculation. Each valuation run freezes an input snapshot, methodology version, parameter set, and transformation sequence. Analyst adjustments remain as overlays while reported values stay intact. Controlled extensions preserve asset-specific terms, accepting additional configuration in exchange for cross-period comparability. Reviewers can move from an output to its assumptions, formulas, source passages, and approvals.

What it enables

The institution can rerun a valuation from the same source snapshot, compare assumption changes across periods, and explain every movement between reported values. Committees can review methodology, inputs, adjustments, exceptions, and approvals in one calculation record. Review teams can reperform the result and identify the exact source, rule, and judgment supporting each material figure.

Responsibility

The engine structures calculations and evidence. The institution or its appointed specialist owns the valuation opinion.

Capabilities
Normalizes positions, cash flows, assumptions, and reference data by effective date
Executes approved valuation methodologies against frozen, reproducible input snapshots
Preserves reported figures and records analyst adjustments as separate overlays
Explains period movements through data, assumption, methodology, and approval changes
Links committee outputs to formulas, sources, exceptions, and review decisions
Sector applications

How each sector applies it.

Asset Management. Recurring valuation control and period movement analysis across holdings. View sector →
Private Markets. Investment-level methodology, assumptions, adjustments, and committee evidence. View sector →
Banking. Controlled fair-value inputs for applicable held investments. View sector →
Corporates. Treasury, pension, or investment portfolio workflows where applicable. View sector →
Contact

Discuss a Related Workflow.

Describe the decision or output, the information behind it, and the review obligation it carries.